Group feedback is one of those well-intentioned strategies that often goes sideways. You gather the team (or class), lay out the issue, and expect a collective course correction. But here’s the problem:
The people who don’t need the feedback start feeling guilty about something unrelated they did back in September.
The people who actually need the correction feel off the hook because, well, the whole group is being addressed, not just them.
The Problem with Group Feedback
Research on feedback effectiveness shows that group feedback can enhance team cohesion and shared responsibility when done right, but in many cases, it backfires. Here’s why:
Diffusion of Responsibility – When everyone is accountable, no one feels personally responsible. The people zoning out think, Well, at least it’s not just me.
Guilt in the Wrong Places – Those who are actually meeting expectations may overanalyze and assume they’re part of the problem.
Lack of Immediate Application – General feedback without clear, individual action steps rarely leads to meaningful change.
The Accountability Gap Part 4
We’ve all seen it before—a bold initiative, a strategic plan, or even just a small team goal that starts with energy and enthusiasm but fizzles out before reaching the finish line. What happened? The Accountability Gap happened. This gap exists when there’s a disconnect between
When (and How) to Give Group Feedback Effectively
The best time to give group feedback depends on how widespread the issue is. Use these thresholds as a guide:
Less than 30% affected? It’s a one-on-one conversation. Address individuals directly so they don’t feel lost in a group message.
Between 30-50% affected? Group feedback may be appropriate. Frame it as a recalibration, not a reprimand.
More than 50% affected? You don’t have a feedback problem; you have an expectations issue. Re-teach the expectation instead of giving feedback.
Action Step Connection:
Every time you see 30% of your students are off-task, use a positive group correction:
1 - Indicate that expectations may need a reset (e.g., “Ooooh, I think we may need a reminder about expectations right now.”)
2 - Give MVP instructions using body language and tone (e.g., “Right now, we need to have our eyes up and hands still.”)
Group Feedback Example 1: Off-Task Behavior in a Classroom (Immediate Feedback, 30-50%)
"Hold up—let’s pause for a second. I’m noticing that about a third of us are off-task. That tells me we might need a quick reset. Eyes up here. Let’s refocus so we can finish strong."
Group Feedback Example 2: Team Missing a Deadline (Delayed Feedback, 30-50%)
"Team, let’s take a moment to reflect. About a third of us struggled to meet the deadline, which signals that something in our process may not be working. Instead of pointing fingers, let’s figure out what adjustments we need to make for next time. What got in the way?"
When Feedback Isn’t the Answer (Over 50%)
If more than half the group isn’t meeting expectations, feedback won’t fix it—re-teaching will.
"I’m noticing that more than half of us aren’t following through on [expectation]. That tells me I didn’t set us up clearly enough, so let’s go back and make sure we’re all on the same page. Here’s what this should look like moving forward…"
Final Thought: When in Doubt, Make It Actionable
If you must give group feedback, tie it to specific, observable actions. The goal is not just awareness but a shift in behavior.
Next time you’re tempted to give broad feedback, ask yourself: Will this change behavior, or make some people feel bad and others feel justified? If it’s the latter, skip the speech and go straight to the source.
One of the things that used to drive me nuts working in higher education was that instead of addressing an issue directly with the person involved, an email would go out to the entire department or unit about it.
As you pointed out, if the person or people didn’t think it was relevant to them, they’d just ignore it, so the problem rarely got resolved.